![]() ![]() To complicate matters, a significant proportion of twentieth-century criticism discusses Part One within the context of Shakespeare's other history plays, particularly those of the second tetralogy: Richard II, Henry IV Parts One and Two,and Henry V or what has been dubbed the "Henriad": Henry IV Parts One and Two,and Henry V. It is, in fact, impossible to describe the critical history of Henry IV, Part One without reference to Part Twoand debate about the relationship between the two plays has occupied many critics (see for example Jenkins 1956, Yachnin 1991, and Pugliatti 1996). Because Falstaff-like most of the play's characters-also appears in Henry IV, Part Two, early criticism usually discusses Henry IV as if the two parts are one play. Henry IV, Part One has always been a controversial play, with much of that controversy focussed on the character that embodies contradictoriness, Sir John Falstaff. 1Falstaff, Henry IV, Part One and early responses ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |